Articles on software architecture, developer tooling, deployment patterns, and the human side of building systems. Flush left, no filler.
Most teams reach for microservices before they've earned them. Here's a framework for deciding when each architecture makes sense.
Blue-green, canary, rolling: which strategy actually fits your team's constraints and risk tolerance?
Retros degrade into therapy sessions because teams skip the one step that makes them useful: defining measurable action items.
Sharing code across micro-frontends sounds elegant until you hit version drift, shared state, and CSS conflicts.
VPS pricing dropped, container orchestration got simpler, but the operational burden of self-hosting is still real.
A pragmatic look at when design tokens add real value versus when CSS custom properties do the job just fine.
Event sourcing solves real problems beautifully, but most teams would be better served by a simpler event-driven approach first.
RFCs, architecture decision records, runbooks, onboarding docs. The higher you go, the more your output is prose.
For single-server deployments, Docker Compose with proper health checks and restart policies handles more than people think.
Enabling strict mode on a legacy codebase forced a rethinking of every function boundary and data contract.